Draft:Request for comment Policies: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m Reverted edit by Cocopuff2018 (talk) to last revision by Tali64^2 Tag: Rollback |
Cocopuff2018 (talk | contribs) →(6) Code of Conduct: will redraft code of conduct section later |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
=== Comments === | === Comments === | ||
# The 12-hour timeframe is a deliberate choice to balance out the time needed to get everything sorted out and introduce rational thinking and not raising issues with Stewards being promoted out of the blue because they "quit yesterday and decided to come back". | # The 12-hour timeframe is a deliberate choice to balance out the time needed to get everything sorted out and introduce rational thinking and not raising issues with Stewards being promoted out of the blue because they "quit yesterday and decided to come back". | ||
# This part is very unclear. Do you mean that we should allow any Steward who resigns to come back within 12 hours of their resignation or force them to go through the RfP process again if they quit? If the former, then no, because a Steward can resign under a cloud and then just come back like nothing happened, avoiding scrutiny from the community; if the latter, then I'm neutral on removing it. | # This part is very unclear. Do you mean that we should allow any Steward who resigns to come back within 12 hours of their resignation or force them to go through the RfP process again if they quit? If the former, then no, because a Steward can resign under a cloud and then just come back like nothing happened, avoiding scrutiny from the community; if the latter, then I'm neutral on removing it. [[User:Tali64^2|Tali64^2]] ([[User talk:Tali64^2|talk]]) 08:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
[[User:Tali64^2|Tali64^2]] ([[User talk:Tali64^2|talk]]) 08:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Line 36: | Line 35: | ||
(3) a Request may be closed by a Steward early at a stewards Discretion Before the minimum of 5 days have passed | (3) a Request may be closed by a Steward early at a stewards Discretion Before the minimum of 5 days have passed | ||
(4) In addition to the Request policy | |||
=== Comments === | === Comments === | ||
| Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
# If users must create alternate accounts to vote and alternate accounts are banned from voting, how do you expect people to vote? | # If users must create alternate accounts to vote and alternate accounts are banned from voting, how do you expect people to vote? | ||
# This is an awful idea and should never be implemented - since nothing in this proposal bans Stewards from voting on their own requests, a Steward can open an RfC, vote in favor of it, and then close it as successful, thus allowing them to change policy however and whenever they want. We should be aiming for a representative consensus-based system, not a dictatorship in all but name. [[User:Tali64^2|Tali64^2]] ([[User talk:Tali64^2|talk]]) 08:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | # This is an awful idea and should never be implemented - since nothing in this proposal bans Stewards from voting on their own requests, a Steward can open an RfC, vote in favor of it, and then close it as successful, thus allowing them to change policy however and whenever they want. We should be aiming for a representative consensus-based system, not a dictatorship in all but name. [[User:Tali64^2|Tali64^2]] ([[User talk:Tali64^2|talk]]) 08:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
== proposal (4) Discord Server == | |||
Skywikis discord server is Ran by multiple Volunteers including Tali, Cocopuff, And EthanBlaisNotAlarms, I am proposing the following is done | |||
(1) Rules are redone and gives users more freedom without a large amount of restrictions | |||
(2) server actions are no longer carried on Wiki unless Severe. | |||
=== Comments === | |||
# The rules should have been redone a long time ago. | |||
# Absolutely - the Discord server and wiki are two separate things and should be treated as such. [[User:Tali64^2|Tali64^2]] ([[User talk:Tali64^2|talk]]) 08:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Proposal (5) Content policy == | |||
While the content policy does give users more freedom to do as they please I feel it could be more clear and a few extra policies could be added in order to Prevent issues and therefore I am proposing | |||
(1) Forking is allowed as long as appropriate is credit) while a lot of Wikis do lack appropriate credit it is important to note the copyright is a big deal and to avoid such issue a policy should be put into place when itc comes to forking) | |||
(2) Wiki must comply with the topic of the Wiki | |||
(3) '''Wikis must not sexualize minors''' | |||
(4) Wikis may not spread false information | |||
=== Comments === | |||
# Forking from wikis on other platforms was never prohibited to begin with. The policy against duplicating SkyWikis exists so there isn't 50 different wikis on the same subject, which will impact our SEO. | |||
# If people want to change the topic of their wiki, as long as it doesn't violate the Content Policy, we should let them. | |||
# There is no point in specifying that sexual content depicting minors is not allowed when sexual content as a whole is already banned. | |||
# This already exists in the [[Global Conduct Policy]]. [[User:Tali64^2|Tali64^2]] ([[User talk:Tali64^2|talk]]) 08:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== (6) Code of Conduct == | |||
* | |||
=== Comments === | |||
[[Global Conduct Policy|We do have a code of conduct, in fact.]] [[User:Tali64^2|Tali64^2]] ([[User talk:Tali64^2|talk]]) 08:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | |||