Draft:Request for comment Policies: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m Reverted edit by Cocopuff2018 (talk) to last revision by Tali64^2 Tag: Rollback |
Cocopuff2018 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
(3) a Request may be closed by a Steward early at a stewards Discretion Before the minimum of 5 days have passed | (3) a Request may be closed by a Steward early at a stewards Discretion Before the minimum of 5 days have passed | ||
(4) In addition to the Request policy | |||
=== Comments === | === Comments === | ||
| Line 41: | Line 43: | ||
# If users must create alternate accounts to vote and alternate accounts are banned from voting, how do you expect people to vote? | # If users must create alternate accounts to vote and alternate accounts are banned from voting, how do you expect people to vote? | ||
# This is an awful idea and should never be implemented - since nothing in this proposal bans Stewards from voting on their own requests, a Steward can open an RfC, vote in favor of it, and then close it as successful, thus allowing them to change policy however and whenever they want. We should be aiming for a representative consensus-based system, not a dictatorship in all but name. [[User:Tali64^2|Tali64^2]] ([[User talk:Tali64^2|talk]]) 08:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | # This is an awful idea and should never be implemented - since nothing in this proposal bans Stewards from voting on their own requests, a Steward can open an RfC, vote in favor of it, and then close it as successful, thus allowing them to change policy however and whenever they want. We should be aiming for a representative consensus-based system, not a dictatorship in all but name. [[User:Tali64^2|Tali64^2]] ([[User talk:Tali64^2|talk]]) 08:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
== proposal (4) Discord Server == | |||
Skywikis discord server is Ran by multiple Volunteers including Tali, Cocopuff, And EthanBlaisNotAlarms, I am proposing the following is done | |||
(1) Rules are redone and gives users more freedom without a large amount of restrictions | |||
(2) server actions are no longer carried on Wiki unless Severe. | |||
== Proposal (5) Content policy == | |||
While the content policy does give users more freedom to do as they please I feel it could be more clear and a few extra policies could be added in order to Prevent issues and therefore I am proposing | |||
(1) Forking is allowed as long as appropriate is credit) while a lot of Wikis do lack appropriate credit it is important to note the copyright is a big deal and to avoid such issue a policy should be put into place when itc comes to forking) | |||
(2) Wiki must comply with the topic of the Wiki | |||
(3) '''Wikis must not sexualize minors''' | |||
(4) Wikis may not spread false information | |||