Template:Ping: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

21 December 2024

12 December 2024

29 July 2023

17 March 2021

29 June 2020

25 October 2019

21 April 2016

16 April 2016

15 April 2016

12 May 2015

16 April 2015

  • curprev 15:3015:30, 16 April 2015 en.wikipedia.org>Technical 13 1,747 bytes +277 Updating to sandbox version per request on talk page and seeing no obvious issues in testcases. undo

6 June 2014

  • curprev 23:1523:15, 6 June 2014 en.wikipedia.org>Technical 13 1,470 bytes −217 Add option to use nickname in ping like "T13" for "Technical 13" undo

1 March 2014

  • curprev 07:4307:43, 1 March 2014 en.wikipedia.org>Callanecc m 1,687 bytes 0 Changed protection level of Template:Reply to: Highly visible template: More than 6000 transclusions, a number which will increase ([Edit=Allow only template editors and admins] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only template editors and undo

31 January 2014

20 December 2013

27 November 2013

  • curprev 01:2301:23, 27 November 2013 en.wikipedia.org>Technical 13 1,215 bytes +320 Undid revision 583449283 for inclusion size testing to see which one is actually better (yeah, probably should have used sandbox, but over half the data is already done.. Won't take long and not a lot of effect on most pages.) undo

26 November 2013

  • curprev 22:2422:24, 26 November 2013 en.wikipedia.org>Technical 13 895 bytes −320 Also results in a much larger template transclusion size when used multiple times on one page (like noticeboards), which crashes pages and causes chaos. Let's discuss it! undo
  • curprev 19:4019:40, 26 November 2013 en.wikipedia.org>TMg 1,215 bytes +320 If you care about parser limits and profiling data, you should use includeonly instead of a dummy parameter; this results in smaller node counts and seems to be faster undo

23 November 2013

21 November 2013

1 November 2013

14 October 2013

7 September 2013

27 June 2013

  • curprev 15:2815:28, 27 June 2013 en.wikipedia.org>Richard BB 427 bytes −1 Reverted to revision 561548653 by Nathan2055: I don't think so; this is how it's always been, and it seems to be the standard in Internet 'tagging'. (TW) undo
  • curprev 15:0215:02, 27 June 2013 en.wikipedia.org>Eric Corbett 428 bytes +1 should there be a space here? undo

25 June 2013

24 June 2013

11 May 2013

6 May 2013

  • curprev 19:3219:32, 6 May 2013 en.wikipedia.org>A930913 455 bytes +83 +verbose fail. Previously did not fail gracefully. Should it fail silently? undo

2 May 2013

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)